Category: Uncategorized

  • Mercury’s Bank Charter Move: What Filing With the OCC Really Signals

    Mercury’s Bank Charter Move: What Filing With the OCC Really Signals

    Mercury has formally applied for a U.S. national bank charter. In December 2025, the company submitted an application to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and, in parallel, applied to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for federal deposit insurance.

    For a fintech that has grown by partnering with regulated banks, this is a structural shift. It does not change how Mercury works today, but it clearly signals how the company sees its future.


    From partner banks to direct regulation

    Until now, Mercury has operated through FDIC-insured partner banks. Customer deposits sit at those institutions, while Mercury focuses on product, software, and customer experience. This model is common across U.S. fintech, especially for companies that want to move fast without carrying full banking regulation from day one.

    A national bank charter would change that setup. If approved, Mercury would become a federally regulated bank, supervised directly by the OCC, and would hold deposits under its own FDIC insurance. That comes with significantly higher regulatory expectations, but also with more control over core banking activities.

    The company has been explicit that nothing changes for customers during the review process. Accounts, products, and access remain exactly as they are while regulators assess the application.


    Why now

    Mercury’s announcement provides context for the timing. The company reports serving more than 200,000 customers, generating around $650 million in annualized revenue, and being GAAP profitable for three consecutive years. It also states that roughly one in three U.S. startups uses its platform.

    Those numbers matter. Charter applications are evaluated not just on vision, but on operational maturity, financial stability, governance, and risk management. Filing at this stage suggests Mercury believes it can meet those expectations and sustain them under ongoing federal supervision.


    What a charter unlocks, and what it demands

    Operating as a national bank allows a company to offer deposit accounts directly, without relying on intermediary banks. That can simplify product architecture and open up longer-term strategic options. At the same time, it introduces continuous regulatory scrutiny, capital requirements, and compliance obligations that do not ease over time.

    This is not a cosmetic upgrade. It is a commitment to running a regulated financial institution, not just a software platform connected to one.


    Leadership and regulatory preparation

    Alongside the application, Mercury announced the appointment of Jon Auxier as Chief Banking Officer and proposed CEO and President of the future bank, subject to approval. His background includes senior roles at regulated financial institutions and experience with bank operations.

    That appointment reinforces the seriousness of the application. Regulators look closely at leadership depth and prior experience when evaluating new bank charters.


    A long road, not a guaranteed outcome

    Submitting an application starts a lengthy process. Approval is not automatic and can take many months. Regulators will review governance, compliance frameworks, financial resilience, and risk controls in detail.

    For now, the filing places Mercury in a small group of fintechs attempting to transition from bank partnerships to full bank status. It is a strategic bet on durability, trust, and long-term control.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    Here are the practical lessons worth noting:

    • Applying for a bank charter is a structural decision, not a branding move.

    • Strong financial performance and operational maturity matter before approaching regulators.

    • Partner bank models work well early, but they shape long-term constraints.

    • Leadership experience becomes critical once regulation is central to the business.

    • Regulatory timelines are long, and outcomes are never guaranteed.

    If you are weighing similar strategic paths, Your Fintech Story helps founders assess regulatory options, trade-offs, and timing. Get in touch.

  • Imprint’s path to a $1bn valuation

    Imprint’s path to a $1bn valuation

    Imprint reached unicorn status after closing a $150 million Series D funding round that valued the company at approximately $1.25 billion. The milestone mattered less because of the headline number and more because of the timing. The round came at a point when late-stage fintech funding was constrained and investor scrutiny had intensified. Imprint stood out by operating in a mature category and still convincing top-tier investors that meaningful growth remained.


    Rebuilding the co-branded card model

    Imprint was founded in 2020 with a clear premise: co-branded credit cards were structurally outdated. In the traditional setup, issuing banks controlled most aspects of the programme, while brands had limited influence over product design, rewards logic, or customer data.

    Imprint approached the market as infrastructure rather than a brand issuing cards directly to consumers. Its platform enables consumer brands to design and operate card programmes that feel like extensions of their own loyalty ecosystems. Imprint handles underwriting, compliance, servicing, and the operational complexity that brands prefer not to own.


    Why investors paid attention

    The Series D round was led by Khosla Ventures, with participation from Thrive Capital, Ribbit Capital, Kleiner Perkins, Hedosophia, Spice Capital, and Timeless. These investors are selective about late-stage fintech exposure, particularly in payments and lending.

    What made Imprint compelling was not novelty, but execution. The company demonstrated that co-branded cards, when paired with modern infrastructure and data-driven rewards, can still scale. Revenue visibility, repeat brand partnerships, and disciplined credit management helped support a valuation north of $1 billion.


    Brand partnerships as distribution

    Imprint’s growth model relies heavily on partnerships with established consumer brands. Publicly referenced partners include Rakuten, Booking.com, Crate & Barrel, and Fetch. Each partnership brings an existing customer base, reducing the need for expensive direct-to-consumer acquisition.

    For brands, the cards act as loyalty accelerators. For Imprint, they create predictable issuance volume and transaction activity. This alignment allows the platform to grow without chasing mass-market consumers or competing head-on with neobanks.


    Product expansion beyond credit

    The Series D funding was also positioned as fuel for expansion. Imprint has outlined plans to broaden its product set beyond unsecured credit cards into debit products, secured cards, and flexible financing options. Loyalty tooling and advertising capabilities are another focus area, reinforcing the idea that cards are engagement products, not standalone payment utilities.

    CEO Daragh Murphy has consistently framed the company’s direction around tighter integration between payments and the brands consumers already trust. That positioning aligns with broader embedded finance trends, while keeping Imprint focused on a clearly defined customer segment.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    Imprint’s journey highlights several lessons worth noting:

    • Mature fintech categories can still produce large outcomes when infrastructure is rebuilt thoughtfully.

    • Brand-led distribution can be more efficient than direct consumer acquisition in regulated products.

    • Late-stage investors prioritise clarity of revenue, risk management, and repeatable partnerships.

    • Product expansion works best when it deepens existing use cases rather than chasing adjacent hype.

    If you are building or scaling a fintech and want help sharpening your strategy, investor narrative, or growth priorities, Your Fintech Story supports founders and leadership teams with clear, experience-led guidance.

    Get in touch if you want to pressure-test your next phase before the market does it for you.

  • PayPal’s push to bring small business banking in-house in the US

    PayPal’s push to bring small business banking in-house in the US

    PayPal has applied to establish a US industrial bank focused on small business lending. The application was submitted to the Utah Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, with the proposed entity structured as a Utah-chartered industrial loan company.

    The filing marks a structural shift in how PayPal could run parts of its lending business in the US, rather than a change in its customer-facing products.


    Why an industrial bank structure matters

    An industrial loan company allows a non-bank parent to own a regulated bank. This structure makes it possible to take deposits and issue loans directly, while operating outside the traditional bank holding company framework.

    For PayPal, this is relevant because small business lending has been part of its offering for years. Since 2013, the company has facilitated more than $30 billion in loans and working capital to over 420,000 business accounts globally. Much of that activity has relied on partner banks.

    A chartered industrial bank would allow more of that lending to sit directly within PayPal’s own regulated entity.


    What the proposed bank would do

    According to the application, the bank would focus on small business lending. It would also offer interest-bearing savings accounts and seek direct membership in US card networks.

    If approved, deposits held at the bank would be eligible for FDIC insurance. From a product standpoint, this does not introduce new consumer features. The change is about balance sheet control, funding sources, and operational efficiency.

    These are less visible changes, but they tend to shape long-term economics.


    Leadership and regulatory scrutiny

    PayPal has named Mara McNeill as president of the proposed bank. Her background is in commercial lending and financial services, which aligns with the operational demands of running a regulated institution.

    Regulatory review will focus on governance, risk management, capital, and compliance. Approval is not guaranteed, and the process is typically detailed and time-consuming.


    A familiar path for scaled fintechs

    As fintech platforms grow, payments, lending, and deposits tend to converge. At that stage, dependence on third-party banks can limit flexibility and margins.

    PayPal’s application reflects that reality. The company already operates at bank-like scale in parts of its business. The charter would formalise that position within the US regulatory framework.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A few grounded lessons stand out:

    • Industrial bank charters offer structural control, not product novelty

    • Lending scale increases pressure to own more of the stack

    • Regulatory readiness needs to precede growth, not follow it

    • Partner banks work well early, but become constraints at scale

    • Governance and risk capabilities matter as much as product design

    If you are approaching similar inflection points, Your Fintech Story helps founders think clearly about structure, regulation, and scale before decisions become expensive to reverse. Get in touch.

  • Revolut wants to be your next mobile operator

    Revolut wants to be your next mobile operator

    Revolut has been expanding its scope for years. What began as a payments app now covers accounts, cards, investing, crypto, insurance, and travel utilities. The next step moves into everyday infrastructure: a full mobile phone plan, sold and managed directly inside the Revolut app. The company has confirmed plans to launch monthly mobile tariffs, starting with the UK and Poland, with a phased rollout across other European markets later. The aim is straightforward. Replace the traditional mobile operator relationship with something simpler and fully app-based.


    What’s actually being launched

    The mobile plan is a subscription service delivered via eSIM. Activation, number transfer, billing, and usage controls all live inside the app. Users can keep their existing number or take a new one, and there is no long-term contract involved.

    The package includes unlimited domestic data, calls, and SMS, plus a roaming data allowance of 20 GB usable across the EU and the United States. Pricing is set aggressively, with an introductory price of ÂŁ12.50 per month and a standard price of ÂŁ14.99 per month for customers joining after the introductory period ends. This is meant to work as a primary line, not as a travel add-on or secondary SIM.


    Where the advantage really comes from

    Revolut is not building mobile networks. Like other digital-first entrants, it operates as an MVNO, relying on existing telecom infrastructure. That part is familiar.

    What matters more is distribution. Revolut already owns the customer relationship, the billing layer, and a daily touchpoint. Millions of users open the app regularly to manage money, subscriptions, and travel. Adding mobile connectivity removes friction telecom operators have struggled with for decades, from store visits and contract complexity to unclear bundles and painful cancellation processes. The mobile plan becomes another controllable line item inside a system users already trust.


    Why the “unlimited” angle lands

    Unlimited plans exist across Europe, but they are rarely simple in practice. Long commitments, layered pricing logic, and vague fair-use limits are common. Revolut’s framing follows the logic fintech users already understand: one price, monthly control, visible usage, and the ability to leave without negotiation.

    For people who already manage critical services through apps, that feels natural. The mobile plan behaves more like software than a utility contract.


    How this fits the bigger picture

    The pattern is consistent with how Revolut has approached other categories. Enter with sharp pricing, integrate deeply into the app, and increase daily relevance. Mobile connectivity raises switching costs without contractual lock-in. When your bank account, cards, subscriptions, travel tools, and phone number all sit in one interface, leaving becomes inconvenient even if it remains technically easy.

    That kind of retention compounds quietly over time.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A few grounded lessons are worth pulling out:

    • Adjacent expansion works best when you already own the primary interface

    • Recurring utilities fit naturally into fintech billing and UX models

    • Clear pricing and easy exits can outperform contractual lock-in

    • Distribution and engagement often matter more than owning infrastructure

    If you’re considering adjacent products or platform expansion, Your Fintech Story helps fintech teams think through strategy before execution gets expensive. Reach out if you want a grounded second opinion.

  • Revolut adds XYO and pulls DePIN into mainstream fintech

    Revolut adds XYO and pulls DePIN into mainstream fintech

    Revolut has added support for the XYO token, and it is a small but interesting signal for the industry. XYO is one of the earliest DePIN projects and is known for its network of nodes that produce location and environmental data. The idea is simple. Instead of relying on centralised infrastructure, the network collects real-world data through distributed devices and makes it available to applications that need verified information.


    Why this matters for accessibility

    Revolut usually focuses on assets with clear consumer demand, so seeing a DePIN token in that list suggests that infrastructure projects are becoming easier for a general audience to understand. You no longer need specialist wallets or dedicated exchanges to access these networks. A typical Revolut user can now buy a token linked to physical-world data systems in the same way they would buy Bitcoin or Ethereum.


    What this means for XYO

    For XYO, the listing acts as a bridge from Web3 communities into mainstream fintech. The project has been operating for several years and has built a large node network, but it has mostly lived inside crypto circles. Revolut changes that dynamic. Millions of users will see the token in their asset list without ever visiting a crypto exchange. It is a simple visibility boost, but visibility still matters.


    The larger industry shift

    There is also a broader industry angle. Fintech apps are slowly diversifying their token offerings toward assets with utility beyond payments. Blockchains that support data verification, physical infrastructure or automation tend to attract interest from companies experimenting with AI workflows or supply chain processes. As these technologies gain more practical use cases, consumer platforms start to treat them less like speculative instruments and more like digital infrastructure.

    Revolut’s move does not mean every user is suddenly going to care about DePIN. Most probably will not. But it shows that a general consumer product is now comfortable offering a token tied to physical-world data validation. A few years ago, that would have looked too niche for a mass-market app.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A short summary before you apply this to your own strategy.

    • Mainstream fintech apps are starting to include tokens linked to infrastructure and data networks.

    • DePIN is becoming easier for non-technical users to access.

    • Real-world data verification is gaining commercial relevance for AI, logistics and digital services.

    • Visibility on large consumer platforms still influences adoption and credibility.

    If you want support in shaping how your fintech positions emerging technologies, Your Fintech Story can help you refine the narrative and communicate it clearly.

  • Airwallex buys into Indonesia: what this APAC move really signals

    Airwallex buys into Indonesia: what this APAC move really signals

    Airwallex has taken a significant step in Asia-Pacific by acquiring a majority stake in PT Skye Sab Indonesia, a payments provider holding a PJP Category 1 licence from Bank Indonesia. That licence gives Airwallex the regulatory foundation it needs to operate locally in one of the most dynamic digital economies in the region.


    Indonesia as a strategic gap in APAC

    Airwallex already covers much of APAC, yet Indonesia has always represented a strategic missing piece. The country has a large SME base, rapid digital adoption and a long-term national digital vision. Plugging into this ecosystem gives Airwallex a practical way to serve both local merchants looking outward and international businesses expanding inward.


    Local licence meets global payments infrastructure

    At the operational level, the acquisition allows Airwallex to pair its global financial rails with local regulatory approval. Indonesian businesses can access multi-currency accounts, international collections, FX and payouts without navigating fragmented providers. Meanwhile, international firms gain a regulated route into a complex but high-growth market. This combination of licensing and infrastructure is becoming a cornerstone strategy for cross-border fintech.


    Backed by fresh capital and a clear product thesis

    The acquisition follows Airwallex’s US$330 million Series G funding round at an US$8 billion valuation. The company highlighted three priorities for that capital: strengthening its core infrastructure, deepening AI capabilities and scaling key markets such as Indonesia. The AI component is particularly relevant because Airwallex plans to automate financial workflows directly on top of the transaction data it already handles. The stronger the licence footprint, the richer the data pool and the more powerful the automation potential.


    Momentum in Southeast Asia supports the move

    Indonesia is not a speculative bet. Airwallex has reported strong performance across Southeast Asia, including sharp growth in revenue and transaction volume. Combined with Indonesia’s more than 60 million SMEs, the regional numbers show that cross-border financial operations are no longer an enterprise-only concern. Smaller businesses expect the same efficiency and global reach, and providers that can deliver both are winning share quickly.


    Lessons for fintech operators

    This acquisition reflects a formula that is becoming increasingly common in global fintech: expand regulatory coverage, reinforce infrastructure and layer intelligence on top. It is a model built on foundations rather than slogans, and it tends to scale well in markets where compliance, trust and operational reliability carry more weight than experimental features.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    Here is what fintech startups can learn from this move.

    • Regulatory licences in target markets shape the product design, not just compliance.

    • Blending local access with global rails is becoming a competitive requirement.

    • AI becomes valuable once real transaction flows and data density are in place.

    • Linking your strategy to national digital priorities can strengthen stakeholder alignment.

    • Demonstrated traction in a region helps when engaging regulators and investors during expansion.


    How Your Fintech Story can help

    If your startup is navigating cross-border strategy, licence requirements or narrative positioning, we can help you structure the roadmap and communicate it effectively.

    Reach out to Your Fintech Story to build a growth strategy that matches your ambition.

  • Innovatrics Backs Dalinora to Bring Trusted AI Financial Guidance to a Wider Audience

    Innovatrics Backs Dalinora to Bring Trusted AI Financial Guidance to a Wider Audience

    Innovatrics has expanded its venture activity with a new investment in Dalinora, a Slovak platform that blends licensed financial expertise with artificial intelligence. The aim is to make reliable financial guidance accessible to people who may never have worked with an advisor before. Biometric Ventures, Innovatrics’s investment arm, views Dalinora as a clear example of how digital identity and financial advice can work together in a way that improves trust and reduces friction for everyday users.


    A New Approach to Digital Advice

    Dalinora positions itself as an AI assisted financial companion that delivers personalised recommendations informed by a user’s goals, financial situation and risk profile. The advice does not stand alone. It is backed by licensed professionals, which gives the model credibility and ensures the recommendations remain compliant and responsible. Users can also implement investment decisions directly inside the app, which creates a more continuous flow from guidance to action.

    Security plays a central role in how the platform is designed. Dalinora incorporates strong identity verification practices aligned with European regulatory expectations. Innovatrics highlights this as a key reason for its support. Reliable identity checks reduce risk for both users and institutions and help ensure that advice is provided in a safe environment. This combination of licensed oversight, AI supported analysis and secure onboarding distinguishes Dalinora in a crowded advice market.


    Backed by Wezeo and Experienced Founders

    The platform is developed with Wezeo, a Slovak technology firm known for its work on fintech and investment applications. Wezeo’s co founder, Grigor Ayrumyan, is also a co founder of Dalinora. This gives the product a strong technical base and experience drawn from prior financial software projects. The platform is currently being piloted in Slovakia, with the intention to expand across Europe once early validation is complete.


    Why Innovatrics Is Leaning Into Fintech

    The investment aligns with Innovatrics’s strategy to support products that combine digital identity with high trust services. Financial advice fits naturally into this focus because trust and security shape how users evaluate digital tools. Dalinora demonstrates how identity assurance, compliance and personalised guidance can reinforce each other and create a more dependable user experience.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A short summary helps highlight the lessons.

    • Trust must be built into the product. Strong identity verification and licensed oversight help users feel confident using AI supported services.

    • Personalised advice can scale. Hybrid models that combine AI with human expertise widen access to financial guidance.

    • The right investors add more than capital. Partners with technical and regulatory experience strengthen product development.

    • Smooth user journeys matter. Allowing users to act on advice inside the same platform reduces friction and improves engagement.

    If your fintech wants clear positioning and messaging that resonates with users and partners, Your Fintech Story can help you shape a narrative that supports your growth.

  • Airwallex reaches an 8 billion valuation after its 330 million Series G

    Airwallex reaches an 8 billion valuation after its 330 million Series G

    Airwallex has raised 330 million in new capital and reached an 8 billion valuation. It is a strong signal in a market where funding rounds often come with flat terms or painful markdowns. Investors appear to be backing the company’s mix of global reach, infrastructure depth and a steady track record of execution. The raise attracted both returning institutional investors and new participants, which usually reflects confidence in the company’s direction rather than a single moment of hype.


    Building a global footprint

    Airwallex is strengthening its international presence by establishing a second global headquarters in San Francisco. The company already has deep roots in Asia Pacific, but the United States remains the most competitive market for financial infrastructure. Creating an executive base there shows intent. It is a commitment to operating on a global stage and competing for both customers and talent in the world’s largest fintech market.

    This expansion fits into the company’s broader pattern. Over the past year, Airwallex has grown its presence in Europe, Asia and the Middle East and now supports more than two hundred thousand businesses. Its positioning is clear. It wants to be the financial infrastructure partner for companies that operate across currencies and borders, not just a payments provider.


    Focus on automation and AI

    A significant part of Airwallex’s strategy revolves around automation. The company has been developing AI driven workflows that target expense management, policy enforcement and other repetitive finance tasks. It recently introduced an AI agent to streamline expense submissions and plans to extend this approach to additional workflows. For companies dealing with multi region teams or complex approval chains, these features can reduce errors and free up internal resources.

    The focus on AI ties directly into the firm’s global growth. Automation becomes more valuable as businesses scale, particularly when they have distributed teams or cross border operations. Airwallex is betting that finance teams want tools that simplify complexity rather than add new layers of software.


    What the Series G enables

    The new capital gives Airwallex room to hire more talent in the United States, continue international expansion and accelerate its AI roadmap. With a larger balance sheet and a clear strategy, the company is positioning itself to influence how global finance operations evolve. If it maintains momentum, it could become one of the central players shaping the next generation of multi currency financial infrastructure.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A short summary for founders.

    • A clear global strategy attracts capital even in slower markets.

    • Expansion works best when supported by strong infrastructure, not surface level localisation.

    • AI features need to solve real workflow problems to create value.

    • Infrastructure first positioning creates more durable revenue than single feature tools.

    • Early awareness of regulatory complexity smooths global growth later.

    If your fintech is preparing for growth or refining its strategy, Your Fintech Story can help you build a plan that resonates with customers and investors.

  • Why Stripe is the next home for Metronome

    Why Stripe is the next home for Metronome

    Metronome has shared that it signed a definitive agreement to be acquired by Stripe. The announcement is written with a steady tone. There is no hype, just a clear message that this step represents a meaningful shift for the company. It reads like a moment where a team looks back at what shaped them and forward at what becomes possible with a stronger foundation beneath them.


    A company guided by disciplined habits

    Metronome highlights three ideas that shaped its culture. Customer Obsession. Hard Work. High Standards. These are not presented as slogans. They are described as the habits that influenced everyday decisions. Customer Obsession meant taking time to understand customer problems instead of rushing to quick fixes. Hard Work was defined as consistently following through. High Standards set the expectation that quality and clarity were the default, not the exception.

    The announcement places real weight on long-term relationships. The team thanks investors for giving them room to build carefully and customers for challenging them to refine the product. It paints a picture of a company that grew by paying attention to what actually mattered and ignoring the shortcuts that often distract early-stage teams.


    Stripe as the next logical environment

    Stripe is introduced as a place where Metronome can extend the work it already started. Stripe has built global financial infrastructure. Metronome has focused on helping companies translate complex usage data into understandable pricing and revenue outcomes. When viewed together, the alignment is clear. Metronome sees this as a way to strengthen the foundation rather than change direction.

    The announcement suggests acceleration more than transformation. The team expects to deliver more of what customers rely on today, supported by Stripe’s scale and operational resources. It is not positioned as a dramatic reinvention. It is framed as an opportunity to go faster and reach further while keeping the principles that shaped the company.


    A signal for teams building with usage based models

    Usage based pricing has become a natural fit for many modern products, especially in software and AI. It allows companies to align value with actual consumption and gives room to experiment with new models as they grow. Metronome has been part of this shift by helping companies manage the complexity that comes with real-time usage data.

    This acquisition suggests that pricing and monetization tools are now seen as foundational infrastructure rather than secondary functions. By joining Stripe, Metronome enters an environment where financial operations, reliability and global reach are core strengths. It signals that monetization logic is becoming a deeper part of the financial systems companies depend on.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A short summary to anchor the main points.

    • Pricing and monetization infrastructure is moving closer to core financial platforms, which may streamline how companies manage revenue processes.

    • Metronome’s disciplined approach to customer relationships and quality aligns well with the needs of fintech teams that operate in complex environments.

    • Stripe’s scale positions Metronome to support more companies that rely on usage based models as they enter new markets.

    • The acquisition reinforces the idea that pricing systems can drive strategic advantage when they are flexible, transparent and built on reliable infrastructure.

    If you want support in evaluating how shifts in the monetization landscape affect your own pricing strategy or growth roadmap, Your Fintech Story can help you translate these industry changes into practical steps for your team.

  • Stablecoins, Payments and BNPL: The Key Regulatory Shifts This Month in the UK

    Stablecoins, Payments and BNPL: The Key Regulatory Shifts This Month in the UK

    Regulators in the UK and EU have been busy shaping new expectations for the fintech and payments sector. The focus this month is on stablecoins, payments infrastructure, consumer protection and the growing divergence between UK and EU regulatory paths. The result is a landscape that keeps expanding in complexity, but also one that provides clearer signals for founders planning their next steps.


    The UK moves closer to a stablecoin framework

    The Bank of England has opened a consultation on a future regime for systemic stablecoins. The plan is to introduce backing asset requirements along with temporary limits on holdings and other controls that help manage transition risks. The consultation remains open until February 2026 and further proposals are expected next year. Final rules are likely to arrive later in 2026.

    The Financial Conduct Authority has also outlined how it intends to supervise cryptoassets and stablecoins. Firms can expect future rules on market abuse, disclosure, prudential obligations and consumer protection. The FCA has also invited firms to join a stablecoin cohort inside its Regulatory Sandbox. Applications close in January 2026 and practical testing is expected to begin soon after.

    Both steps make it clear that the UK is moving from high level signals to detailed frameworks. For stablecoin issuers and service providers this means preparation needs to begin now rather than later.


    A long term vision for UK payments

    Alongside the crypto developments, UK regulators have presented a new strategy for the future of retail payments. The goal is to upgrade the foundation beneath account to account payments and support new types of digital money, including tokenised deposits and stablecoins. The strategy also focuses on resilience, data sharing and innovation. A more detailed Payments Forward Plan is due by the end of the year and will set the agenda for the next stage of infrastructure change.

    As of 3 December 2025 there is also a practical update for Buy Now Pay Later providers. Domestic suppliers offering interest free BNPL arrangements no longer require credit broking permissions under changes to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. This simplifies the regulatory burden for certain firms that work only with interest free products.


    Diverging UK and EU paths

    Across the EU, payments and fintech firms continue to deal with rising complexity around compliance, resilience and consumer protection. The EU remains focused on harmonised regulation through instruments such as PSD2 and resilience rules tied to digital operations.

    The UK, by contrast, is developing its own approach to stablecoins and payments infrastructure. The difference in direction is becoming clearer and will matter for firms active in both markets. A single operating model will become harder to maintain and cross border strategies will need more flexibility.


    Key takeaways for fintech startups

    A quick overview before wrapping up.

    • The Bank of England is moving toward a defined regime for systemic stablecoins, so preparation is essential.

    • The UK payments infrastructure strategy will shape opportunities in account to account and digital money services.

    • Interest free BNPL providers may benefit from reduced permissions requirements.

    • Firms operating in both the UK and EU need to plan for growing regulatory divergence.

    If you want help navigating these changes or adjusting your strategy in a shifting regulatory environment, Your Fintech Story is here to support your next move.